<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Linux Virtualization comments on openMosix project shutting down</title>
    <link>http://linuxvirtualization.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Linux Virtualization comments</description>
    <item>
      <title>"openMosix project shutting down": comment by Dan Kusnetzky</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Virtual Iron created a virtual machine/single system image clustering product and delivered it as the first few versions of their cleverly named product, Virtual Iron. They stepped away from the concept later to focus on their management tools and Xen. Their logic seems very similar to that expressed by Moshe Bar.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:34:50 EDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://linuxvirtualization.com/articles/2007/07/16/openmosix-project-shutting-down#comment-266</guid>
      <link>http://linuxvirtualization.com/articles/2007/07/16/openmosix-project-shutting-down#comment-266</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"openMosix project shutting down" by drcrane</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Moshe Bar has  announced that the openMosix project is ending because &amp;#8220;The increasing power and availability of low cost multi-core processors is rapidly making single-system image (SSI) Clustering less of a factor in computing. The direction of computing is clear and key developers are moving into newer virtualization approaches and other projects&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Moshe is behind the Qumranet startup that is developing Linux kernel virtual machine (KVM).&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;This loss of openMosix strikes me as a shame.  I rather liked the idea of a single system image (extreme &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NUMA&lt;/span&gt;?), especially when combined with virtualization.  Why not have a 64-way &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SMP&lt;/span&gt; box where groups of 4 to 8 CPUs are actually independent machines.  CPUs could be added on the fly and parts of the &amp;#8220;machine&amp;#8221; could even be migrated to new hosts without impacting services.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m surprised that there isn&amp;#8217;t demand / market for this but I guess there really isn&amp;#8217;t, Virtual Iron used to offer single system image clustering (or should be call it aggregation) prior to their switch to the Xen hypervisor as well.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;See &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=715406"&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt; on openMosix mailing list and check out the &lt;a href="http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/"&gt;openMosix website&lt;/a&gt; if you&amp;#8217;re interested in more information.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:37:00 EDT</pubDate>
      <guid>&lt;a href="/articles/2007/07/16/openmosix-project-shutting-down"&gt;openMosix project shutting down&lt;/a&gt;</guid>
      <link>&lt;a href="/articles/2007/07/16/openmosix-project-shutting-down"&gt;openMosix project shutting down&lt;/a&gt;</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
