<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Linux Virtualization comments on QEMU vs. KQEMU vs. KVM</title>
    <link>http://linuxvirtualization.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Linux Virtualization comments</description>
    <item>
      <title>"QEMU vs. KQEMU vs. KVM" by drcrane</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With the just announced open sourcing of the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;QEMU&lt;/span&gt; accelerator it would be interesting to have some idea of the performance differences between &lt;span class="caps"&gt;QEMU&lt;/span&gt;, QEMU + accelerator and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;KVM&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;It turns out that someone has already done the hard work for us.  See &lt;a href="http://linux.inet.hr/"&gt;http://linux.inet.hr/&lt;/a&gt; article &lt;a href="http://linux.inet.hr/finally-user-friendly-virtualization-for-linux.html"&gt;Finally user-friendly virtualization for Linux&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;KVM&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;QEMU&lt;/span&gt; with it&amp;#8217;s accelerator both appear to be capable of utilizing &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CPU&lt;/span&gt; and memory at close to native speeds (perhaps 80%). Definitely worth another look on the laptop.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <pubDate>Tue,  6 Feb 2007 18:46:00 EST</pubDate>
      <guid>&lt;a href="/articles/2007/02/06/qemu-vs-kqemu-vs-kvm"&gt;QEMU vs. KQEMU vs. KVM&lt;/a&gt;</guid>
      <link>&lt;a href="/articles/2007/02/06/qemu-vs-kqemu-vs-kvm"&gt;QEMU vs. KQEMU vs. KVM&lt;/a&gt;</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
