<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Linux Virtualization comments on More about KVM</title>
    <link>http://linuxvirtualization.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Linux Virtualization comments</description>
    <item>
      <title>"More about KVM" by drcrane</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;KVM&lt;/span&gt; project website is now up.  For those interested in more details see the &lt;a href="http://www.qumranet.com/wp/kvm_wp.pdf"&gt;KVM Whitepaper&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;One would wonder if hypervisors are losing their relevancy.  With &lt;span class="caps"&gt;UML&lt;/span&gt; already in the kernel and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;KVM&lt;/span&gt; hopefully on the way the kernel already has the native ability to create a &amp;#8220;virtual machine&amp;#8221; (at least in some sense of the word).  The argument against maintaining &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NUMA&lt;/span&gt;, SMP, multi-core support, etc. in both a hypervisor and the kernel makes a lot of sense to me.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;KVM&lt;/span&gt; is now included in Andrew Morton&amp;#8217;s -mm kernels, see &lt;a href="http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc5/2.6.19-rc5-mm1/announce.txt"&gt;announcement for 2.6.19-rc5-mm1&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:57:00 EST</pubDate>
      <guid>&lt;a href="/articles/2006/11/11/more-about-kvm"&gt;More about KVM&lt;/a&gt;</guid>
      <link>&lt;a href="/articles/2006/11/11/more-about-kvm"&gt;More about KVM&lt;/a&gt;</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
